<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Energy: It&#8217;s about the grid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidlew.is/google-energy-its-about-the-grid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidlew.is/google-energy-its-about-the-grid/</link>
	<description>David Lewis finally blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeff_molander</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/google-energy-its-about-the-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff_molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=240#comment-70</guid>
		<description>David...&lt;br&gt;Brilliantly laid out and argued.  At the heart of your argument (but perhaps not vital to Google&#039;s ultimately rolling out such services) is a reliance on Google -- an acceptance of what we (the consuming public) have already shown all but a complete willingness to participate in.  A massive Ignorance Economy where we make trade-offs for everything from novelties to, yes, truly valuable services.  We trade privacy and data for the candy.  We&#039;re already doing it: ie. businesses buy media from the same company that analyzes the ROI in exchange for free, world class Web analytics dashboards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ironically, I think much of what powers the chatter you refer to (re: becoming the next Enron/big energy company) is based purely on the *perception* of Google being a science-minded company.  I&#039;m not saying that they&#039;re not but I am suggesting that what you&#039;ve laid out is far more logical/well-reasoned in terms of where this is going NEXT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8230;<br />Brilliantly laid out and argued.  At the heart of your argument (but perhaps not vital to Google&#39;s ultimately rolling out such services) is a reliance on Google &#8212; an acceptance of what we (the consuming public) have already shown all but a complete willingness to participate in.  A massive Ignorance Economy where we make trade-offs for everything from novelties to, yes, truly valuable services.  We trade privacy and data for the candy.  We&#39;re already doing it: ie. businesses buy media from the same company that analyzes the ROI in exchange for free, world class Web analytics dashboards.</p>
<p>Ironically, I think much of what powers the chatter you refer to (re: becoming the next Enron/big energy company) is based purely on the *perception* of Google being a science-minded company.  I&#39;m not saying that they&#39;re not but I am suggesting that what you&#39;ve laid out is far more logical/well-reasoned in terms of where this is going NEXT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Energy: It’s about the grid</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/google-energy-its-about-the-grid/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Smart Grid Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Energy: It’s about the grid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=240#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] via Google Energy: It’s about the grid. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Google Energy: It’s about the grid. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
