<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter is a river&#8230; and the levees may burst</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/</link>
	<description>David Lewis finally blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:08:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Community Intervention: Twitter.com finally gets the RT</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Intervention: Twitter.com finally gets the RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] needs. For instance, the RT has been around for it seems all time in the Twittersphere. I recently criticized Twitter Inc. for not updating its site in ages and soon after we got Lists and now the Retweet (as reported by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] needs. For instance, the RT has been around for it seems all time in the Twittersphere. I recently criticized Twitter Inc. for not updating its site in ages and soon after we got Lists and now the Retweet (as reported by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweet Repeat &#38; the Self Retweet</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweet Repeat &#38; the Self Retweet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] I usually read on my G1 with Twitdroid (agreed to be the best Android Twitter app&#8230; of course, no official app from Twitter) and that is usually in down time so it&#8217;s OK. [Please suggest tools for me to try below. I&#039;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I usually read on my G1 with Twitdroid (agreed to be the best Android Twitter app&#8230; of course, no official app from Twitter) and that is usually in down time so it&#8217;s OK. [Please suggest tools for me to try below. I&#39;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Alex, if Evan, Biz &amp; gang were out to make a quick buck, they would have accepted the rumored $500 million offered by Google and Facebook earlier this year. They turned it down which means they believe in the long-term viability of Twitter as an independent company (or Twitter as a more expensive acquisition target). I just don&#039;t get why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, if Evan, Biz &#038; gang were out to make a quick buck, they would have accepted the rumored $500 million offered by Google and Facebook earlier this year. They turned it down which means they believe in the long-term viability of Twitter as an independent company (or Twitter as a more expensive acquisition target). I just don&#8217;t get why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I think Twitter is overvaluated but the market correction is coming soon. If I were the CEO, I&#039;d do anything to go for those multimillion bonuses already, to make sure I am ok when this whole thing is going down the tubes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Twitter is overvaluated but the market correction is coming soon. If I were the CEO, I&#8217;d do anything to go for those multimillion bonuses already, to make sure I am ok when this whole thing is going down the tubes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy N</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you. Twitter the medium seems analogous to email. Imagine it was invented by Email Inc. and they carry all traffic. Now here come commercial email apps, ad-carrying webmail sites, etc-- all making money on Email Inc&#039;s back. If Email Inc decides they must charge per email, what happens? Probably not a new free competitor, since the outcome of that is already known. More like a standard protocol, so email becomes peer-to-peer, everybody shares the load, nobody owns it. As is The Way Of The Internet (it&#039;s how email really works, for example). I can imagine Twitter the company ultimately losing to twitter the protocol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you. Twitter the medium seems analogous to email. Imagine it was invented by Email Inc. and they carry all traffic. Now here come commercial email apps, ad-carrying webmail sites, etc&#8211; all making money on Email Inc&#8217;s back. If Email Inc decides they must charge per email, what happens? Probably not a new free competitor, since the outcome of that is already known. More like a standard protocol, so email becomes peer-to-peer, everybody shares the load, nobody owns it. As is The Way Of The Internet (it&#8217;s how email really works, for example). I can imagine Twitter the company ultimately losing to twitter the protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ackerman</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ackerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Good analysis, David, and like your Uncle Rick, I too am always confused as to how these popular companies, what with there attractive and fluffy bun platforms and presentations, become the shizz-nit end-all, attracting capital from all sorts of places, when there isn&#039;t a burger inside to be found... 

Is there really so much I can do with Twitter that I cannot do off most other platforms or an iPhone?

QuAckerman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis, David, and like your Uncle Rick, I too am always confused as to how these popular companies, what with there attractive and fluffy bun platforms and presentations, become the shizz-nit end-all, attracting capital from all sorts of places, when there isn&#8217;t a burger inside to be found&#8230; </p>
<p>Is there really so much I can do with Twitter that I cannot do off most other platforms or an iPhone?</p>
<p>QuAckerman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I can get real-time information from many more sites using Google. This feature was announced last month so I would assume that Google is improving this feature. Try it: http://www.google.com/search?q=twitter&amp;tbs=qdr:n

I hope that Evan and gang have plans on how to generate revenue. I hope that T. Rowe Price and the 4 VC firms have seen these plans and didn&#039;t invest in traffic numbers. I just heard the promise of finding monetization later and finding ways to monetize this type of information for too many years. I enjoy Twitter and am rooting for its success. I&#039;d just like to know where that financial success (in the form of revenue, not equity) will come from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I can get real-time information from many more sites using Google. This feature was announced last month so I would assume that Google is improving this feature. Try it: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=twitter&#038;tbs=qdr:n" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=twitter&#038;tbs=qdr:n</a></p>
<p>I hope that Evan and gang have plans on how to generate revenue. I hope that T. Rowe Price and the 4 VC firms have seen these plans and didn&#8217;t invest in traffic numbers. I just heard the promise of finding monetization later and finding ways to monetize this type of information for too many years. I enjoy Twitter and am rooting for its success. I&#8217;d just like to know where that financial success (in the form of revenue, not equity) will come from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan douglas</title>
		<link>http://davidlew.is/twitter-is-a-river-and-the-levees-may-burst/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidlew.is/?p=14#comment-2</guid>
		<description>buyers and sellers make markets - - you are a seller....i am betting on them coming up with a way to monetize real time information....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buyers and sellers make markets &#8211; - you are a seller&#8230;.i am betting on them coming up with a way to monetize real time information&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
